naca-report-378

naca-report-378
  • Version
  • 323 Downloads
  • 1.81 MB File Size
  • 1 File Count
  • August 25, 2016 Create Date
  • August 25, 2016 Last Updated
Scroll for Details

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Report - Comparison of Full Scale Properties Having RAF-6 and Clark Y Airfoil Sections

naca-report-378 Comparison of Full Scale Properties Having RAF-6 and Clark Y Airfoil Sections-1

In this report, the efiiciencies of two series of pro—,
pellers having two types of blade sections are compared.
Sixfull—scale propellers were used, three having R. A. F.—6
and three Clark Y airfoil sections with thickness,‘chord
ratios of 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10. The propellers were tested
at fire pitch settings, which covered the range ordinarily
used in practice. These tests were conducted in the
Propeller Research Tunnel of the National Advisory
Committee for Aeronautics.

The propellers having the Clark Y sections gate the
highest pealc efiiciency at the low pitch settings. At the
higher pitch settings, the propellers with the, R. A. F.—6
sections gate about the same maximum efiiciency as the
Clark Y propellers and were more efioient for the condi-
tions of climb and take-of.

The airfoil sections most commonly used in this
country in propeller design are the R. A. F.—6 and
Clark Y. The following tests, which were made
incidental to some high tip speed propeller tests
(Reference 1) in the Twenty-Foot Propeller Research
Tunnel of the National Advisory Committee for
Aeronautics, afi‘ord an interesting comparison of these
airfoil sections as shown by the performance of full—
scale propellers.

Six propellers were used in this investigation, three
with R. A. Frfi and three with Clark Y sections.
The propellers of each group had thickness/chord
ratios of 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10. The airfoil sections
used on these propellers are not, strictly speaking,
Clark Y or R. A. F.—6 sections but are modifications
of these. However, in this report for the sake of
convenience, they will be referred to simply as Clark Y
and R. A. F.—6 sections.

The Propeller Research Tunnel and its test equip-
ment have been described in Reference 2. The
propellers were driven by a 435—horsepower Curtiss
D—l2 engine, mounted in an open-cockpit tractor
body as shown in Figure 1.

FileAction
naca-report-378 Comparison of Full Scale Properties Having RAF-6 and Clark Y Airfoil Sections.pdfDownload 

Comment On This Post

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

naca-report-378

naca-report-378
  • Version
  • 323 Downloads
  • 1.81 MB File Size
  • 1 File Count
  • August 25, 2016 Create Date
  • August 25, 2016 Last Updated
Scroll for Details

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Report - Comparison of Full Scale Properties Having RAF-6 and Clark Y Airfoil Sections

naca-report-378 Comparison of Full Scale Properties Having RAF-6 and Clark Y Airfoil Sections-1

In this report, the efiiciencies of two series of pro—,
pellers having two types of blade sections are compared.
Sixfull—scale propellers were used, three having R. A. F.—6
and three Clark Y airfoil sections with thickness,‘chord
ratios of 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10. The propellers were tested
at fire pitch settings, which covered the range ordinarily
used in practice. These tests were conducted in the
Propeller Research Tunnel of the National Advisory
Committee for Aeronautics.

The propellers having the Clark Y sections gate the
highest pealc efiiciency at the low pitch settings. At the
higher pitch settings, the propellers with the, R. A. F.—6
sections gate about the same maximum efiiciency as the
Clark Y propellers and were more efioient for the condi-
tions of climb and take-of.

The airfoil sections most commonly used in this
country in propeller design are the R. A. F.—6 and
Clark Y. The following tests, which were made
incidental to some high tip speed propeller tests
(Reference 1) in the Twenty-Foot Propeller Research
Tunnel of the National Advisory Committee for
Aeronautics, afi‘ord an interesting comparison of these
airfoil sections as shown by the performance of full—
scale propellers.

Six propellers were used in this investigation, three
with R. A. Frfi and three with Clark Y sections.
The propellers of each group had thickness/chord
ratios of 0.06, 0.08, and 0.10. The airfoil sections
used on these propellers are not, strictly speaking,
Clark Y or R. A. F.—6 sections but are modifications
of these. However, in this report for the sake of
convenience, they will be referred to simply as Clark Y
and R. A. F.—6 sections.

The Propeller Research Tunnel and its test equip-
ment have been described in Reference 2. The
propellers were driven by a 435—horsepower Curtiss
D—l2 engine, mounted in an open-cockpit tractor
body as shown in Figure 1.

FileAction
naca-report-378 Comparison of Full Scale Properties Having RAF-6 and Clark Y Airfoil Sections.pdfDownload 
17,005 Documents in our Technical Library
2820761 Total Downloads

Search The Technical Library

Newest Additions

NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
AA-CP-20212-001
AA-CP-20212-001
ADPO10769 Occurrence of Corrosion in Airframes
The purpose of this lecture is to provide an overview ...
MIL-STD-1759 Rivets and Rivet Type Fasteners Preferred for Design
The purpose of this book form standard is to provide ...
MIL-STD-810G Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests
This standard contains materiel acquisition program planning and engineering direction ...